Research

Applied Kinesiology (AK) Research

  Applied Kinesiology Research and Collected Papers
Edited by Scott Cuthbert, Doctor of Chiropractic, (Pueblo, Colorado, USA).

  On the reliability and validity of manual muscle testing: a literature review:

Index Medicus Journal article on MMT and AK (.pdf / 316 kb)
By Dr. Scott Cuthbert D.C. and Dr. George J. Goodheart Jr D.C.

A body of basic science and clinical research has been generated on the manual muscle test (MMT) since its first peer-reviewed publication in 1915.
The aim of this report is to provide an historical overview, literature review, description, synthesis and critique of the reliability and validity of MMT in the evaluation of the musculoskeletal and nervous systems.

More than 100 studies related to MMT and the applied kinesiology chiropractic technique (AK) that employs MMT in its methodology were reviewed, including studies on the clinical efficacy of MMT in the diagnosis of patients with symptomatology.
With regard to analysis there is evidence for good reliability and validity in the use of MMT for patients with neuromusculoskeletal dysfunction.
The observational cohort studies demonstrated good external and internal validity, and the 12 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that were reviewed show that MMT findings were not dependent upon examiner bias.

ICAK Press Release

  10 years worth of Structured Abstracts from the International College of Applied Kinesiology, ICAK Collected Papers: ICAK Applied Kinesiology Collected Papers Structured Abstracts 2006-1996.doc (601 kb)
  Applied Kinesiology Research Compendium: AK Research Compendium.doc (419 kb) version 2006-02-18
  Applied Kinesiology Collected Papers 2001-2006: Applied Kinesiology Collected Papers.doc (385 kb)
  George Goodheart, D.C. Bibliography: George Goodheart DC, Bibliography.doc (73 kb)

Applied Kinesiology / Kinesiologic Medicine Research

  1. Leisman, G., Shambaugh, P., Ferentz, A.
Somatosensory Evoked Potential Changes During Muscle Testing.
International Journal of Neuroscience. 1989; 45:143-151.

This study measured the way the central nervous system (brain) is functioning when muscles test strong versus when they test weak. Clear, consistent and predictable differences were identified in the brain between weak and strong muscle test outcomes. This supports the idea that manual muscle testing outcome changes reflect changes in the central nervous system.


  2. Leisman, G., et al.
Electromyographic Effects of Fatigue and Task Repetition on the Validity of Estimates of Strong and Weak Muscles in Applied Kinesiology Muscle Testing Procedures.
Perceptual and Motor Skills. 1995; 80:963-977.

This paper describes the results of six independent studies. The points supported by the research were:
a) Muscles identified as “weak” using applied kinesiology manual muscle testing methods are fundamentally different state than those identified as “strong;”
b) Muscles testing “weak” using AK are fundamentally different than muscles that are fatigued. In other words, “weakness” is not attributable to fatigue;
c) AK muscle testing procedures can be objectively evaluated via quantifying the neurologic electrical characteristics of muscles;
d) The cause and effect of applied kinesiology treatment can be plotted over time objectively.


  3. Perot, C., Meldener, R., Gouble, F.
Objective Measurement of Proprioceptive Technique Consequences on Muscular Maximal Voluntary Contraction During Manual Muscle Testing.
Agressologie. 1991; 32(10):471-474.

This French study measured the electrical activity in muscles. It established that there was a significant difference in electrical activity in the muscle, which corresponded with the difference perceived of “strong” versus “weak” muscle testing outcomes by AK practitioners. It further established that these outcomes were not attributable to increased or decreased testing force from the doctor during the tests. In addition, the Perot study showed that manual treatment methods used by AK practitioners to reduce the level of tone of spindle cells in the muscle are in fact capable of creating a reduction in tone of the muscle, as had been observed clinically.


  4. Lawson, A., Calderon, L.
Interexaminer Agreement for Applied Kinesiology Manual Muscle Testing.
Perceptual and Motor Skills. 1997; 84:539-546.

This study demonstrated significant interexaminer reliability for individual tests of the pectoralis major and piriformis muscles, but not for the tensor fascia lata or hamstring, which are essentially tests of groups of muscles at once. The primary importance of this study is that it demonstrates the reliability and reproducibility of muscle testing as a clinical tool, while also highlighting the need for clinicians to be aware of potential inaccuracies involved with the testing of some muscle groups.


  5. Schmitt, W., Leisman, G.
Correlation of Applied Kinesiology Muscle Testing Findings with Serum Immunoglobulin Levels for Food Allergies.
International Journal of Neuroscience. 1998; 96:237-244.

This study showed a high degree of correlation between AK procedures used to identify food allergies and serum levels of immunoglobulins for those foods. AK methods in this study consisted of stimulation of taste bud receptors with various foods, and observation of changes in manual muscle testing that resulted. The patient was judged to be allergic to foods that created a disruption of muscle function. Blood drawn subsequently showed that patients had antibodies to the foods which were found to be allergenic through AK assessment.


  6. Caruso, B., Leisman, G.
A Force/Displacement Analysis of Muscle Testing.
Perceptual and Motor Skills. 2000; 91:683-692.

Using a force transducer developed by Dr. Caruso, this study demonstrated the difference between muscles which the examiners perceived to be "weak" or inhibited, and those perceived to be "strong" or facilitated. This study also demonstrated that examiners with over five years of clinical experience using AK procedures were shown to have reliability and reproducibility when their outcomes were compared. Also, the perception of inhibition or facilitation was made in the initial pressure exerted by the examiner and this was corroborated by test pressure analysis using the instrumentation developed.


  7. Motyka, T., Yanuck, S.
Expanding the Neurological Examination Using Functional Neurologic Assessment Part I: Methodological Considerations.
International Journal of Neuroscience. 1999; 97:61-76.

The authors discuss AK as a clinical measure of neurologic function. A review of the literature reveals methodological problems with previous studies of AK as a form of neurologic assessment. The authors discuss the problems with research designs that do not reflect the clinical practice of AK which are common in the literature. They outline principles of AK and recommend that future research reflect more accurately the clinical practice of functional neurologic assessment and AK.
In addition to the studies described above, early studies are reviewed. While some of these early studies provide evidence in support of applied kinesiology, some failed to corroborate clinical observations common to applied kinesiology prctice. Flaws in research methodology inherent in these early studies are reviewed. Requirements for proper research methodology and for adequate skill level of practitioners are reviewed.

  Read the whole article: Motyka, T., Yanuck, S. (at www.icakusa.com)

  8. Schmitt, W., Yanuck, S.
Expanding the Neurological Examination Using Functional Neurologic Assessment Part II: Neurologic Basis of Applied Kinesiology.
International Journal of Neuroscience. 1999; 97:77-108.

This paper proposes a neurologic model for many of the AK procedures. Manual assessment of muscular function is used to identify changes associated with facilitation and inhibition, in response to the introduction of sensory receptor-based stimuli.
Muscle testing responses to sensory stimulation of known value are compared with usually predictable patterns based on known neuroanatomy and neurophysiology, guiding the clinician to an understanding of the functional status of the patient's nervous system. The proper understanding of the neurophysiologic basis of muscle testing procedures will assist in the design of further investigations into AK. Accordingly, the neurophysiologic basis and proposed mechanisms of these methods are reviewed.

Functional Neurologic Assessment and treatment methods common to the practice of applied kinesiology are presented. These methods are proposed to enhance neurological examination and treatment procedures toward more effective assessment and care of functional impairment. These assessment procedures are used in addition to other standard diagnostic measures to augment rather than replace the existing diagnostic armamentarium.

  Read the whole article: Schmitt, W., Yanuck, S. (at www.icakusa.com)

  9. Caruso, W., Leisman, G.
The Clinical Utility of Force/Displacement Analysis of Muscle Testing in Applied Kinesiology.
International Journal of Neuroscience. 2001; 106:147-157.

The goal of the study is to provide a physical record to support the subjective judgment that constitutes an AK muscle test. These records are perceptible to any interested observer and also allow the observer to distinguish clearly the two outcome states. That is, the images presented in the record by conditionally inhibited and conditionally facilitated muscles are unambiguously distinct. And the distinction must be rigorously quantifiable. Unlike the X-ray of the radiologist and the histological specimen of the clinical pathologist, however, the objective record will not be the source of the AK practitioner’s judgment; that is, he will continue to rely on his trained perception of the event that produces the record. But the record will stand after the fact as a piece of objective evidence that others may examine in order to confirm the practitioner’s judgment.



  10. Monti, D., Sinnott, J., Marchese, M., Kunkel, E., Greeson, J.
Muscle Test Comparisons of Congruent and Incongruent Self-Referential Statements.
Perceptual and Motor Skills. 1999, 88:1019-1028.

This study investigated differences in values of manual muscle tests after exposure to congruent and incongruent semantic stimuli.
Muscle resting with a computerized dynamometer was performed on the deltoid muscle group of 89 healthy college students after repetitions of congruent (true) and incongruent (false) self-referential statements. The order in which statements were repeated was controlled by a counterbalanced design. The combined data showed that approximately 17% more total force over a 59% longer period of time could be endured when subjects repeated semantically congruent statements (p<.001). Order effects were not significant. Over all, significant differences were found in muscle test responses between congruent and incongruent semantic
stimuli.

Different studies

Frese, E., Brown, M., Norton, B.J.
Clinical Reliability of Manual Muscle Testing.
Physical Therapy. 1987; 67:1072-1076.

Grossi, J.A.
Effects of an Applied Kinesiology Technique on Quadriceps Femoris Muscle Isometric Strength.
Physical Therapy. 1981; 61:1011-1016.

Haas M., Peterson, D., Hoyer, D., Ross, G.
The Reliability of Muscle Testing Response to a Provocative Vertebral Challenge.
Journal of Manipulative and Physiologic Therapeutics. 1993; 5(3):95-100.

Haas, M., Peterson, D., Hoyer, D., Ross, G.
Muscle Testing Response to Vertebral Challenge and Spinal Manipulation: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Construct Validity.
Journal of Manipulative and Physiologic Therapeutics. 1994; 17(3):141-148.

Hsieh, C.Y., Phillips, R.B.
Reliability of Manual Muscle Testing with a Computerized Dynamometer.
Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. 1990; 13:72-82.

Jacobs, G.E.
Applied Kinesiology: An Experimental Evaluation By Double Blind Methodology.
Journal of Manipulative and Physiologic Therapeutics. 1981; 4(3):141-145.

Leisman, G.
Limb Segment Information Transmission Capacity.
Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. 1989;12(1):3-9.

Leisman, G., Koch, P.A.
Cybernetic Model of Psychophysiologic Pathways: I. Control Functions.
Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. 1989; 12(2):98-108.

Leisman, G.
Cybernetic Model of Psychophysiologic Pathways: II. Consciousness of Effort and Kinesthesia.
Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. 1989; 12(3):174-191.

Leisman, G.
Cybernetic Model of Psychophysiologic Pathways: III. Impairment of Consciousness of Effort and Kinesthesia.
Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. 1989; 12(4):257-265.

Leisman, G., Vitori, R.
Limb Segment Information Transmission Capacity Infers Integrity of Spinothalamic Tracts and Cortical Visual-Motor Control.
International Journal of Neuroscience. 1990; 50:175-183.

Marino, M., Nicholas, J.A., Gleim, G., Rosenthal, P., Nicholas, S.J.
The Efficacy of Manual Assessment of Muscle Strength Using a New Device.
American Journal of Sports Medicine. 1982; 10:360-364.

Nicholas, J. A., Sapega, A., Kraus, H., Webb, J.N.
Factors Influencing Manual Muscle Tests in Physical Therapy.
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 1978; 60-A:186-190.

Nicholas, J.A., Melvin, M., Saraniti, A.J.
Neurophysiologic Inhibition of Strength Following Tactile Stimulation of the Skin.
American Journal of Sports Medicine. 1980; 8:181-186.

Perot, D., Goubel, F., Meldener, R.
Quantification of the Inhibition of Muscular Strength Following the Application of a Chiropractic Maneuver.
Journale de Biophysique et de Biomecanique. 1986; 32(10):471-474.

Rybeck, D.H., Swenson, R.
The Effect of Oral Administration of Refined Sugar on Muscle Strength.
Journal of Manipulative Physiological Therapeutics. 1980; 3:151-161.

Scopp, A.
An Experimental Evaluation of Kinesiology in Allergy and Deficiency Disease Diagnosis.
Journal of Orthomolecular Psychiatry. 1979; 7(2):137-8.

Triano, J.J.
Muscle Strength Testing as a Diagnostic Screen for Supplemental Nutrition Therapy: A Blind Study.
Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. 1982; 5:179.

Reference - source of information

  ICAK-U.S.A.
6405 Metcalf Ave., Suite 503, Shawnee Mission, KS 66202, USA
Phone: 913-384-5336 Fax: 913-384-5112
Email: info@icakusa.com
Visit the Website at: www.icakusa.com
 

The Kinesiology Network - www.Kinesiology.net / www.Kinesiology.com / www.Kinesiology.org
Sigtunagatan 3, SE-113 22 Stockholm, Sweden

Editor: Mac Pompeius Wolontis, Kinesiology Network.